首页> 外文OA文献 >Settling for second best?: Reflections after the tenth anniversary of Wal-Mart's entry to the United Kingdom
【2h】

Settling for second best?: Reflections after the tenth anniversary of Wal-Mart's entry to the United Kingdom

机译:争取第二佳吗?:沃尔玛进入英国十周年后的反思

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose - This paper evaluates the comparative progress of Asda in the UK since its surprise takeover by Wal-Mart in 1999. Wal-Mart expected to become the #1 retailer in the UK and many commentators saw massive problems ahead for local retailers. These expectations were not met; this paper investigates why. Design/Methodology/Approach - Asda’s progress is considered through a brief discussion of the company’s history to 1999, an investigation of the changes Wal-Mart subsequently made to Asda’s operations, the comparative impact of these changes and then a consideration of the restrictions on impact deriving from organisational, competitive and environmental factors. Findings - Despite the strong rhetoric on entry, the commercial reality has seen only moderate success for Asda, and a widening gap to the market leader, Tesco. Explanation for this includes competitive strategy and reactions, market restrictions particularly in land-use planning, and unwillingness by Asda (Wal-Mart) to alter their focused store format strategy in line with competitor actions and market directions. Research Limitations/Implications - The analysis is at a macro corporate and national level, drawing mainly on published data. Research implications include the rebalancing of considerations of organisational competence and market environment factors on international success. A focus on political and non-market activities is suggested, though an unwillingness of companies to reconsider strategic directions is also indicted as a key factor. Practical Implications - Implications for national and international strategic decision making at the corporate and governmental levels are identified. Businesses can use the findings to re-consider their positioning and actions. Reflections on hyperbolic reactions to takeovers might also be provoked. Originality/Value - No other paper has considered the market level changes in connection with Asda since its take-over by Wal-Mart and sought explanations for the relative (lack of) performance. The conclusion, that Asda has not been as successful as reported in the literature and the media, is original.
机译:目的-本文评估了Asda自1999年被沃尔玛意外收购以来在英国的相对进展。沃尔玛有望成为英国排名第一的零售商,许多评论家认为本地零售商面临着巨大的问题。这些期望没有得到满足;本文调查了原因。设计/方法论/方法-通过简要讨论公司至1999年的历史,调查沃尔玛随后对Asda的运营进行的更改,这些更改的比较影响以及对影响的限制的考虑,来考虑Asda的进展来自组织,竞争和环境因素。调查结果-尽管进入市场时言辞激烈,但商业现实对Asda而言仅取得了适度的成功,并且与市场领先者Tesco的差距越来越大。对此的解释包括竞争战略和反应,市场限制(尤其是在土地使用计划中的限制)以及阿斯达(沃尔玛)不愿意根据竞争对手的行为和市场方向来改变其有针对性的商店形式战略。研究的局限性/意义-分析是在宏观公司和国家层面上进行的,主要是基于已发布的数据。研究意义包括重新考虑组织能力和市场环境因素对国际成功的影响。建议将重点放在政治和非市场活动上,尽管公司不愿意重新考虑战略方向也被认为是关键因素。实际意义-确定对公司和政府层面的国家和国际战略决策的意义。企业可以使用调查结果重新考虑其定位和行动。也可能引发对收购的双曲线反应的反思。原创性/价值-自从沃尔玛接管Asda以来,没有其他论文考虑过与Asda有关的市场水平变化,并寻求有关相对(缺乏)表现的解释。 Asda的成功不如文献和媒体报道的结论是原始的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sparks, Leigh;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号